|
January
17, 2005
Volume 83, Number 3
p. 75
COMMENT
A CHEMIST'S CAROL
WILLIAM F. CARROLL, ACS PRESIDENT
There is no doubt that the chemistry enterprise in the U.S. is changing rapidly,
and this concerns many of our members. With change com es opportunity, but
it is difficult to take advantage of change without understanding what it might
bring.
To help with this understanding, I've designed one of my major presidential
projects, Enterprise
2015, as a visioning exercise of the state of chemistry
in the U.S. 10 years from now. Enterprise
2015 will proceed in three steps,
and its success will depend on the engagement of ACS members in the process.
With an idea of what the future will bring, we will be able to intervene
to change circumstances or our personal approaches to them.
The first step involves analyzing the current situation and the forces driving
the enterprise. I am working closely with the chemistry community and an
outside consultant to bring this together. In step two, we will seek to envision
the
possible consequences of those forces as they act on the various parts of
our discipline--industry, academe, and government. In step three, we will
distill
the many views of the future into a single document that will provide a glimpse
of where we, the members of ACS, think our field is going.
This ACS Comment is written to announce the availability of the Situation
Analysis paper. To generate this paper, we interviewed 30 leaders of
industry, academe,
and government and asked them whether they perceived that their area
of the discipline was changing, and if so, to describe the vectors driving
that
change. The document, written to include all those points of view,
is available at
the project website, http://chemistry.org/chemistryenterprise2015.html.
It's a short paper--easily read in a few minutes. The observations
of our interviewees are organized under five overarching topics:
the shape of the
enterprise; economic
issues; science and technology; education, workforce, and career;
and government policy. There are common themes that run through all these
topics as well:
multidisciplinarity, cost, and globalization, among others. We hope
the paper will provoke thought and discussion about where our students
and scientists
will come from and where our schools, our businesses, and our careers
are headed.
While I recognize this comparison comes a bit late for the season,
the steps of this exercise are analogous to the story in Charles
Dickens' "A Christmas
Carol." As you no doubt remember, in this story the selfish
curmudgeon Scrooge is visited in his dreams by four spirits. The
first is that of
his dead business partner, who introduces him sequentially to the
three spirits
of Christmas Past, Christmas Present, and Christmas Yet To Come.
The vision progresses from one of a familiar memory to a present
with evident
issues
to a disquieting future that includes Scrooge's own death, alone
and unmourned.
But the Spirit of Christmas Yet To Come showed only how things
would be if they continued on their current trajectory. Scrooge
realized
his opportunity
and intervened in the present to better his future and that of
those around him.
The process of Enterprise 2015 follows a similar path. Many of
us of a certain age remember "Chemistry Past" comfortably located within the four
corners of organic, inorganic, physical, and analytical. "Multidisciplinary" meant
organometallic and maybe biochemistry. The chemical industry in the U.S.
was expanding, and building a plant was never a wrong decision--it was
just a matter
of timing. This is where we've been.
But in "Chemistry Present" we see change. Industry and universities
in other countries are developing rapidly. Fewer students come to the
U.S. to study. Companies we recognize as American build new facilities
in the
Middle East or the Asia-Pacific region but not here. Government funding
for research
is uncertain. We perceive that things are going in unfamiliar directions.
The Situation Analysis summarizes the present state of the field.
Starting with the Situation Analysis, we can either chart
a smooth trajectory for the next 10 years or hypothesize
events
that might
radically alter current
paths. Biology is now a dominant theme in chemistry, but
will the promise of biotechnology be realized? Will $100-per-barrel
oil
shift the national
emphasis
to energy research and renewable feedstocks? In that case,
would our freshwater supply be a boon to an agriculture-based
chemical
economy?
Will developing
countries maintain stable governments and meteoric growth?
The collected views of members--individually or in discussion
groups organized from now through the spring national
meeting in San Diego--will
be collated
into our vision of the next 10 years. This is the work
of the "Spirit
of Chemistry Yet To Come"--to envision the future
as it would be without intervention.
Enterprise 2015 will make up an important part of the
programming at the fall national meeting in Washington,
D.C. We will
have a symposium showcasing
the
vision of our members and that of experts on key nonchemical
topics--all culminating in a town meeting. We also
have planned a number of
supporting symposia dealing
with education, chemical safety and security, globalization,
the history
of other times of change in the chemistry enterprise,
and other important topics
that will help round out our visioning exercise.
In the end, with an idea of what the future will bring,
we will be able to intervene to change circumstances
or our
personal approaches to them. Your
participation is essential. Please take the time
to read the paper and send an e-mail with your thoughts
on Chemistry
Yet
To Come
to
me at chementerprise2015@acs.org.
|